In the application of the
liquid level gauge, in addition to
understanding its application and inspection, we must also grasp the necessary
fundamental inspection methods. The most commonly used methods in inspection
are panel tightening method, direct touch method, tracing method, comparative
substitution method, test discrimination method and dumb slaughter method. The
following six approaches are explained.
1. Direct Touch Method
Direct touch method is a method of judging
the stop of direct sensation in eyes, ears, nose and hands. It is a helpful
wrist that is lacking in test. All the departments, levels, roads and points
can be used in the process of tightening. Occasionally it is particularly
important in determining what is wrong.
2. Panel Tightening Method
The method of panel tightening applies the
method of holding circuit switches, knobs, jacks and buttons on the panel of
float liquid level gauge
to stop the
faulty tightening. The method of panel tightening is a common external
austerity method used to determine the faulty scene and the faulty Ministry
level. However, because the panel of the
liquid
level gauge is not identical so completely and differently, it is the best
parts to determine the faults in the construction. Therefore, it is necessary
to work with other methods to determine the existence of faults completely and occasionally.
So, in particular, panel tightening method is an ineffective way to help.
3. Test Discrimination Method
Test discrimination is a method of
identifying the number of stops of circuit data measured by instruments. It is
the most commonly used fundamental method for tightening the defective roads
and points. The test discrimination method can be divided into two kinds:
power-on test and no-power-on test. The power-on test includes three kinds: the
test of the voltage and current of the level gauge, the test of the parameters
of the circuit components, and the test of the important technical indicators
of the level gauge. The most commonly used is voltage and current testing. No-power-on
test refers to the test of the relevant circuits, devices, components and
insulation resistance of the l
iquid level
gauge. By comparing the measured data with the deformity data, it is
possible to distinguish whether the liquid
level gauge has an end-to-end barrier or a fault category. For example, the
data reviewed by ZO zirconia oxygen content analyzer can be compared with our
electronic sample data sheet. If it does not conform to the standard, the
instrument may show faults, or wiring results, etc.
4. Disturbance Tracking Method
With a small screwdriver in hand, all
levels of electronic devices are buckled step by step from the last stage of
the liquid level gauge
to the front
stage. Meanwhile, the size of the action in the actuator and the presence or
absence of loudspeaker sound is determining the defective parts and levels. For
example, in the process of disturbance tracking, the invention knocks on a
certain level of deformity. When knocking to the first level silently or
soundlessly, the pole between the latter and the former is the defective part.
5. Searching
Method of Flag Lamp
The method of examining the faults of the
compact magnetically flipped column
liquid
level gauge by using the flag lamp tracer (the simplest is a detector
consisting of a semiconductor diode and a headset). The method is: from the
output of the flag lamp generator to the liquid
level gauge to be repaired, using the flag lamp tracer from the front to
monitor the flag lamp, so as to determine the fault level.
6. Flag and Signal Tracking Method
Audio, intermediate frequency and high frequency
signals are input to the liquid level
gauge step by step from back to front by using the signal generator. At the
same time, the output size from the terminal components is checked to see
whether the tasks at all levels are malformed or not, and the fault grade is
determined.
7. Tracing Method
Tracing method is the basic method to test
the high sensitivity of magnetic flip plate liquid level gauge. It includes disturbance tracing method, flag
lamp tracing method and flag lamp tracing method.
8. Comparative Substitution Method
The comparative substitution method is to
stop comparing and replacing liquid level
gauge, components, devices and components with the same example in order to
distinguish the advantages and disadvantages, deformities or not. In the
absence of instruments or in the case of unfamiliar liquid level gauge, it is relatively simple and easy to compare
substitution magicians to distinguish between good and bad, deformity or not.
9. Dumb Slaughter Method
Dumb-level slaughtering method is used to
test the crying, humming and noise of
liquid
level gauge. Detailed methods are as follows: using capacitors or short-circuit
bars with large capacity, short-circuit input circuit and output circuit of
flag lamp of each level meter step by step from front to back in order to
determine the defective part and grade. If the fault scenario is stable or has
little influence at a certain level of short circuit, and the fault disappears
at a later stage of short circuit, then the location of the fault is between
the latter stage and the former stage, as well as the related circuit.